From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brighton

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Feb 2, 2015
No. 71864-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

71864-9-I

02-02-2015

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER HAMILTON BRIGHTON, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Alexander Brighton appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to residential burglary. He contends, and the State concedes, that the court erred in concluding that his Montana convictions are comparable to Washington offenses and must be included in his offender score. The parties also agree that the matter must be remanded for resentencing consistent with State v. Jones, ___ Wn.2d ___, 338 P.2d 278, 282-83 (2014). (under RCW 9.94A.530(2), both parties may present evidence on remand relevant to criminal history). We accept the concession of error and remand for resentencing consistent with Jones.


Summaries of

State v. Brighton

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Feb 2, 2015
No. 71864-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Brighton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER HAMILTON BRIGHTON, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

Citations

No. 71864-9-I (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2015)