From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brewton

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Twenty-Eighth District
Oct 1, 2006
636 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. 2006)

Summary

stating that "because we find no error in the instructions, defendant's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must also be rejected"

Summary of this case from State v. Laliberte

Opinion

No. 589P05-2

5 October 2006

John Keating Wiles, Raleigh, for Aaron Jonwan Brewton.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of July 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006.

Timmons-Goodson, J., recused.


Summaries of

State v. Brewton

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Twenty-Eighth District
Oct 1, 2006
636 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. 2006)

stating that "because we find no error in the instructions, defendant's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must also be rejected"

Summary of this case from State v. Laliberte
Case details for

State v. Brewton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AARON JONWAN BREWTON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina, Twenty-Eighth District

Date published: Oct 1, 2006

Citations

636 S.E.2d 812 (N.C. 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Laliberte

In view of the fact that the trial court did not err, much less commit plain error, by allowing the jury to…

State v. Kirby

Because there was no error, any failure to object by trial counsel did not prejudice defendant and, as a…