From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bracken

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 20, 1996
916 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 65441, 67772.

February 20, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ANNA C. FORDER, JUDGE.

Gary E. Brotherton, State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Christine M. Blegen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant, Antoine Bracken, appeals from his judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, for second degree murder and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

As to defendant's direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25 (b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b).

Defendant's convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of defendant's Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bracken

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 20, 1996
916 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Bracken

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. ANTOINE L. BRACKEN, APPELLANT. ANTOINE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 20, 1996

Citations

916 S.W.2d 419 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Bracken v. Dormire

Bracken sought post-conviction relief pro se under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15. Counsel was reappointed…