From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bond

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 31, 2001
2001 WI 56 (Wis. 2001)

Opinion

Case No.: 98-3139-CR.

Oral Argument: May 2, 2001.

Opinion Filed: May 31, 2001.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender.



The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bond

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 31, 2001
2001 WI 56 (Wis. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Bond

Case Details

Full title:State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: May 31, 2001

Citations

2001 WI 56 (Wis. 2001)
2001 WI 56
627 N.W.2d 484

Citing Cases

State v. Hambly

¶ 59. The defendant relies heavily on State v. Bond, 2000 WI App 118, ¶ 15, 237 Wis. 2d 633, 614 N.W.2d 552,…

State v. Morgan

We have recently recognized that the brevity of the exchange is not controlling and may instead confirm the…