From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bollar

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Aug 18, 2021
164 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2021)

Opinion

2021-0756

08-18-2021

STATE v. BOLLAR


CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue as stated on pages 2-3 of the court of appeals’ June 9, 2021 entry: "Whether Ohio's legislature has specifically authorized cumulative punishments for multiple firearm specifications that were committed as part of the same act or transaction under the narrowly tailored, specifically designated circumstances set forth in R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g), when the underlying felonies attendant to the firearm specifications are merged at sentencing as allied offenses of similar import pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)." The conflict cases are State v. Doyle, 2019-Ohio-979, 133 N.E.3d 890 (8th Dist.), and State v. Roper, 9th Dist. Summit Nos. 26631 and 26632, 2013-Ohio-2176. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2021-0769, State v. Bollar.


Summaries of

State v. Bollar

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Aug 18, 2021
164 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2021)
Case details for

State v. Bollar

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. BOLLAR

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

164 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2021)
164 Ohio St. 3d 1409

Citing Cases

State v. Hoskin

Whether Ohio's legislature has specifically authorized cumulative punishments for multiple firearm…

State v. Blackburn

{¶43} We note the Fifth Appellate District has made a contrary determination on this issue, see State v.…