From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Blank

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 5, 1970
464 P.2d 836 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Submitted on record January 22, 1970

Affirmed February 5, 1970

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

JOHN J. MURCHISON, Judge.

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FOLEY, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


Defendant was tried and convicted upon jury trial of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property. He did not take the witness stand. His sole ground of appeal is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury:

"Every witness who testified is presumed to speak the truth. This presumption, however, may be overcome by the manner in which he or she testifies, by the character of his or her testimony, by the interest he or she has in the outcome of the case, by contradictory evidence, or by a presumption."

State v. Kessler, 254 Or. 124, 458 P.2d 432 (1969), holds that this instruction is not erroneous.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Blank

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 5, 1970
464 P.2d 836 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

State v. Blank

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALTON M. BLANK, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 5, 1970

Citations

464 P.2d 836 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
464 P.2d 836

Citing Cases

State v. Naughten

" This instruction is not erroneous. State v. Kessler, 254 Or. 124, 458 P.2d 432 (1969); State v. Blank, 1…