From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Beloved

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Dec 9, 2015
873 N.W.2d 775 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

providing the trial court's assessment that "the defendant is just stalling trying to avoid the inevitable resolution of this case," based on previous actions of the defendant throughout the trial justified a finding of voluntary absence.

Summary of this case from State v. Thompson

Opinion

No. 14–1796.

12-09-2015

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jean BELOVED, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Beloved

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Dec 9, 2015
873 N.W.2d 775 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

providing the trial court's assessment that "the defendant is just stalling trying to avoid the inevitable resolution of this case," based on previous actions of the defendant throughout the trial justified a finding of voluntary absence.

Summary of this case from State v. Thompson
Case details for

State v. Beloved

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jean BELOVED, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

873 N.W.2d 775 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Thompson

For a defendant's absence to be voluntary, he "must be aware of the processes taking place, of his right and…

State v. Hurlbut

Did Hurlbut have a sound reason for not appearing at trial? See State v. Beloved, No. 14-1796, 2015 WL…