From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Becker

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Oct 13, 1998
982 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 69517.

OPINION FILED: October 13, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and\or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 28, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. JOAN M. BURGER, JUDGE.

Richard H. Sindel, Sindel Sindel, 8008 Carondelet, Suite 301, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Joanne E. Joiner, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before James A. Pudlowski, P.J., William H. Crandall Jr. and Clifford H. Ahrens, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty of one count of forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo Cum. Supp. 1990, and one count of attempt to commit forcible rape, section 566.030. Defendant appeals from the judgments on both convictions. Defendant was sentenced by the court as a prior offender to two concurrent life sentences. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Becker

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Oct 13, 1998
982 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Becker

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, vs. DONALD GREGORY BECKER, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

982 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Becker v. State

Movant appealed both the judgment entered on his conviction and the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion.…