From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 27, 2012
40 A.3d 318 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-27

Eddie RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

April E. Brodeur, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


April E. Brodeur, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Eddie Rodriguez' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 336, 27 A.3d 404 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly apply Phillips v. Warden, 220 Conn. 112, 595 A.2d 1356 (1991), and conclude that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate that the trial attorney had a conflict of interest of constitutional magnitude?”


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 27, 2012
40 A.3d 318 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Eddie RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 27, 2012

Citations

40 A.3d 318 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 911

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Corr.

The court granted the petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the…