From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Arreola-Botello

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 31, 2018
292 Or. App. 214 (Or. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

A161566

05-31-2018

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mario ARREOLA-BOTELLO, Defendant-Appellant.

Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services. Jacob Brown, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.


Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jacob Brown, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Hampton , 247 Or. App. 147, 268 P.3d 711 (2011), rev. den. , 352 Or. 107, 284 P.3d 485 (2012) ; State v. Gomes , 236 Or. App. 364, 236 P.3d 841 (2010).


Summaries of

State v. Arreola-Botello

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 31, 2018
292 Or. App. 214 (Or. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Arreola-Botello

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mario ARREOLA-BOTELLO…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: May 31, 2018

Citations

292 Or. App. 214 (Or. Ct. App. 2018)
418 P.3d 785

Citing Cases

State v. Arreola-Botello

The Court of Appeals agreed with the state and affirmed defendant’s conviction in a per curiam decision. See…