From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Armadore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 23, 2019
330 Conn. 965 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

01-23-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Darius ARMADORE

Matthew C. Eagan, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Paul J. Narducci, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 186 Conn.App. 140, 198 A.3d 586 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly deny the defendant's motion to file a late motion for rectification and the defendant's motion for permission to file a supplemental brief, which would have allowed the defendant to present an issue before the Appellate Court that the defendant claims is controlled by the retroactive application of Carpenter v. United States, U.S., 138 S.Ct. 2206, 201 L.Ed. 2d 507 (2018)?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the defendant's evidentiary claim on the basis that it was not properly preserved?"

ROBINSON, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Armadore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 23, 2019
330 Conn. 965 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Armadore

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Darius ARMADORE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

Citations

330 Conn. 965 (Conn. 2019)
200 A.3d 188

Citing Cases

State v. Armadore

The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court's judgment of conviction, and the defendant sought certification…