From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Andres C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 1, 2022
342 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2022)

Opinion

03-01-2022

STATE of Connecticut v. ANDRES C.

Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition. Matthew A. Weiner, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Matthew A. Weiner, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 208 Conn. App. 825, 266 A.3d 888 (2021), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the defendant had waived his claim that he was entitled to disclosure of the contents of the complainant's journals as the discoverable statements of a witness?

"2. Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the Brady review; see Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963) ; of the complainant's journals by a nonlawyer member of the state's attorney's office was constitutionally adequate?"


Summaries of

State v. Andres C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 1, 2022
342 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Andres C.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. ANDRES C.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

342 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2022)
270 A.3d 97

Citing Cases

State v. Andres C.

(Citation omitted.) State v. Andres C., 342 Conn. 901, 270 A.3d 97 (2022). We resolve the first question on…