From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 2007
44 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-07395.

October 30, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated July 5, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel; William C. Nash on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Krausman, Florio and Dillon, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level as shown on the risk assessment instrument. The defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special circumstances warranting such a departure. In fact, his contention that his ill health would militate against his reoffending is belied by his own actions in committing a sexual offense at a time when his kidneys allegedly had already failed ( see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404, 405-406; People v Davis, 26 AD3d 364; cf. People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515, 516).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the People's contentions.


Summaries of

State v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 2007
44 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. CURTIS R. ADAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8205
845 N.Y.S.2d 375

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriquez

umstances warrants a departure to avoid an overassessment of the danger presented by the defendant and the…