From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 24, 2016
132 A.3d 1095 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

02-24-2016

STATE of Connecticut v. Roberto ACOSTA.

Daniel J. Foster, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Brett R. Aiello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Daniel J. Foster, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Brett R. Aiello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 162 Conn.App. 774, 129 A.3d 808 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court, in a case alleging sexual assault, did not abuse its discretion in concluding that evidence of uncharged misconduct by the defendant twelve years previously was not ‘too remote’ for admissibility purposes under State v. DeJesus, 288 Conn. 418, 953 A.2d 45 (2008)?”


Summaries of

State v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 24, 2016
132 A.3d 1095 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Roberto ACOSTA.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 24, 2016

Citations

132 A.3d 1095 (Conn. 2016)
320 Conn. 922

Citing Cases

State v. Acosta

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court,…