From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1992
188 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Tucker, the insurance company's attorney made an unconditional offer in open court prior to commencement of the trial of the underlying personal injury action to pay its insured's policy limit.

Summary of this case from Fama v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

December 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Brucia at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 1992
188 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

In Tucker, the insurance company's attorney made an unconditional offer in open court prior to commencement of the trial of the underlying personal injury action to pay its insured's policy limit.

Summary of this case from Fama v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Case details for

State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Respondent, v. JAMES TUCKER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

Fama v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

In addition, the evidence in the record fails to establish that the defendant made a tender of the $50,000…

1 Citing Cases