From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1986
122 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

July 7, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to obtain written consent from the petitioner, as required by the policy as a condition to underinsured motorist coverage, before settling with the parties who may have been liable for his injury. In making such a settlement on record and before a judge, the appellant stipulated to discontinue his action against the City of New York and the joint tort-feasor Edward Quinn "with prejudice", and in so doing, he failed to preserve the petitioner's right of subrogation against the city and Quinn. Thus, the appellant's failure to comply with the written consent provision of the policy prejudiced the petitioner and precludes the appellant from asserting his underinsured motorist claim (see, Weinberg v Transamerica Ins. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 379; Tucker v Seward, 400 So.2d 505 [Fla App]). Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 7, 1986
122 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Taglianetti

Case Details

Full title:STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. VICTOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Shawer

Where, as here, an insured fails to preserve its insurer's subrogation rights, the insured is precluded from…

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Monge

There is nothing in the record before the court to indicate that the petitioner's consent was sought prior to…