From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Williams v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1992
422 S.E.2d 691 (N.C. 1992)

Opinion

No. 129A92

(Filed 19 November 1992)

Appeal of right by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 105 N.C. App. 470, 414 S.E.2d 81 (1992), finding no error in the trial and affirming a judgment entered 17 September 1990 by Allen (Claude W., Jr.), J., in District Court, Franklin County. Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review of additional issue pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a), N.C. R. App. P. 15(a) and 16(a), was allowed. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 October 1992.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by T. Byron Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State, plaintiff-appellant.

No counsel contra.


This is an action, brought pursuant to Article 9, Chapter 110, and Article 3, Chapter 49, of the North Carolina General Statutes, to establish paternity of an illegitimate child and to require defendant to support the child and to reimburse the State for past public assistance provided to the child. At trial the jury found defendant not to be the child's father, and a judgment was entered accordingly in favor of defendant. A majority of the Court of Appeals, Judge Walker dissenting, found no error in the trial and affirmed the judgment.

Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review of an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

For the reasons given in Judge Walker's dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the matter remanded to that court for further remand to the District Court, Franklin County, for a new trial.

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED; REVERSED AND REMANDED; NEW TRIAL.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Williams v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1992
422 S.E.2d 691 (N.C. 1992)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Williams v. Coppedge

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EX REL. BEVERLY WILLIAMS, MOTHER OF LATOYA…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1992

Citations

422 S.E.2d 691 (N.C. 1992)
422 S.E.2d 691

Citing Cases

Dept. of Human Services v. Moore

Apparently, relationships outside the period of possible conception would be inadmissible under the Rules of…

Brooks v. Hayes

Allowing an expert to express an opinion as to who is the father tramples upon the jury's domain. State ex…