From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 15, 1933
187 N.E. 75 (Ohio 1933)

Opinion

No. 24094

Decided June 15, 1933.

Municipal corporations — Addition to existing public utility — Ordinance subject to referendum — Section 4227-1 et seq., General Code — Insufficient signatures to referendum petition, due to withdrawals.

IN MANDAMUS.

Mr. William A. Miller, Mr. G.A. Resek and Mr. H.H. Hoppe, for relator.

Mr. J.J. Smythe, village solicitor, and Messrs. Andrews, Hadden Burton, for respondent.


This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the reply, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that such demurrer be sustained for the reason that while the ordinance in question provides for an addition to an existing public utility and not for the acquisition or construction of a public utility, and hence is subject to referendum, not under the Constitution of Ohio, Article XVIII, Section 5, but under Section 4227-1 et seq., General Code, the petition does not contain a sufficient number of signatures to require the respondent to certify the same to the board of elections. State, ex rel. Kahle, v. Rupert, Aud., 99 Ohio St. 17.

Relator not desiring to plead further, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, STEPHENSON, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

BEVIS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 15, 1933
187 N.E. 75 (Ohio 1933)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. NICHOLL, A TAXPAYER v. MILLER, VILLAGE CLERK

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 15, 1933

Citations

187 N.E. 75 (Ohio 1933)
187 N.E. 75

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel. Schell v. Abbott

We have carefully considered the question here presented and our conclusion is that the trial court was…

Lynn v. Supple

Opinions of Attorney General (1915), 824, 826. However, this court's decision in State, ex rel. Kahle, v.…