From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel., v. MacConnell

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 3, 1936
169 So. 657 (Fla. 1936)

Opinion

Opinion Filed August 3, 1936.

A case of original jurisdiction — mandamus.

Vocelle Mitchell, for Relator;

Ben C. Willis and Charles H. Spitz, for Respondent.


This is a companion case to that other case entitled State of Florida ex relatione City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Relator, v. A.C. MacConnell, as City Clerk of City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent, the only difference being that the revenue certificates in this case are sought to be issued against the net revenues of an electric power system while in the other case they are sought to be issued against the net revenues of a water supply system. See Williams v. Town of Dunnellon filed this term.

On authority of the opinion and judgment in the above mentioned case and cases therein cited, the motion to quash should be denied and the peremptory writ of mandamus should issue and it is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

ELLIS, P.J., concurring upon the principle announced in his specially concurring opinion in the companion case this day filed.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel., v. MacConnell

Supreme Court of Florida
Aug 3, 1936
169 So. 657 (Fla. 1936)
Case details for

State, ex Rel., v. MacConnell

Case Details

Full title:STATE, ex rel. CITY OF VERO BEACH, v. A.C. MacCONNELL, as City Clerk of…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Aug 3, 1936

Citations

169 So. 657 (Fla. 1936)
169 So. 657

Citing Cases

Brooks v. City of Jacksonville

, 152 Sou. Rep. 6; State v. City of Lake City, 116 Fla. 10, 156 Sou. Rep. 924; State v. City of Daytona…