From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 22, 1939
23 N.E.2d 637 (Ohio 1939)

Opinion

No. 27722

Decided November 22, 1939.

Mandamus — Misjoinder of respondents — Reinstatenment of civil service employee in Bureau of Unemployment Compensation — Administrator only appointing authority — Sections 1345-13 and 12283, General Code.

IN MANDAMUS.

Relator, Earl A. Stine, seeks a writ of mandamus to restore him to all the benefits, privileges, emoluments and rights of the position of claims examiner, grade III, Cincinnati office, District 13, of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, to which position he was appointed, December 19, 1938, from a civil service eligible list.

He names as respondents (1) the administrator of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, (2) the assistant administrator and (3) the office manager of the Cincinnati office of the bureau.

Relator's petition alleges that on March 18, 1939, as a result of an unlawful conspiracy on the part of the respondents to wrongfully deprive him of his position in the classified civil service of the state, the respondent Atkinson dismissed relator from his position, claiming to terminate his services on the 90th day of his probationary period under the alleged authority of Section 486-13, General Code, and that respondents have wrongfully prevented him from performing the duties of his position and from enjoying the rights, privileges and emoluments thereof.

Other facts alleged in relator's petition need not be recited in deciding the joint demurrer of the three respondents thereto.

Mr. Jerome Goldman, for relator.

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, and Mr. John P. Walsh, for respondents.


Under Section 1345-13, General Code (116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 286, 298), the power of appointment was exercised by the Unemployment Compensation Commission, subject to the civil service laws, but under Section 1346-1, General Code (Section 2, S. B. No. 57, 93 General Assembly, 118 Ohio Laws, —), the powers and duties of that commission were vested solely in the administrator of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation.

Assuming relator was lawfully appointed and unlawfully dismissed as alleged, the administrator is the only person to whom a writ of mandamus may issue compelling reinstatement of the relator. Section 12283, General Code.

The demurrer will be sustained for misjoinder of respondents and the relator will be granted 20 days in which to plead further.

Demurrer sustained.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, MYERS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 22, 1939
23 N.E.2d 637 (Ohio 1939)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. STINE v. ATKINSON, ADMR. OF BUREAU OF UNEMPLOYMENT…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 22, 1939

Citations

23 N.E.2d 637 (Ohio 1939)
23 N.E.2d 637

Citing Cases

Stine v. Atkinson

It is obvious that such acts could only be effective at the office of such ultimate authority in Franklin…

State, ex Rel. Alford, v. Willoughby

The court below erred in dismissing the complaint on this ground. Appellee Eastlake Civil Service Commission…