From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Plain Dealer Publishing v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 19, 2006
847 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

2006-0945.

May 19, 2006.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file its brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondents shall file their brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents brief.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Plain Dealer Publishing v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 19, 2006
847 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Plain Dealer Publishing v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO. v. FLOYD

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 19, 2006

Citations

847 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio 2006)
109 Ohio St. 3d 1474
2006 Ohio 2453

Citing Cases

Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Floyd

{¶ 23} On May 19, 2006, we granted an alternative writ and issued a schedule for the presentation of evidence…