From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n Complainant v. Clayborne

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 28, 2013
2013 OK 92 (Okla. 2013)

Opinion

Case Number: SCBD-5757

10-28-2013

STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION Complainant, v. MARK ANTHONY CLAYBORNE, Respondent.


NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

On June 10, 2011, the Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), notified the Office of the Chief Justice that the respondent, Mark Anthony Clayborne (lawyer/respondent), had been found guilty by a jury of one count of perjury by subornation and one count of false preparation of exhibits as evidence.

On June 20, 2011, the Court, Pursuant to Rule 7.3 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. Supp. 2007 Ch. 1, Ap. 1-A, immediately suspended the respondent from the practice of law until further order of the Court -- regardless of the pendency of an appeal. However, the Court noted that the respondent had appealed the conviction to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals.

On September 10, 2013, the conviction was affirmed in part and reversed in part. Pursuant to Rules 7.4 and 7.5, 5 O.S. 2011 Ch. 1, App. 1-A, of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, the respondent was given until October 7, 2013, to show cause in writing why a final order of discipline should not be imposed. The respondent neglected to respond to the show cause order and the Oklahoma Bar Association requested that he be disbarred because his criminal conviction of the felony of subornation of perjury constitutes clear and convincing evidence of his unfitness to practice law and serious interference with the administration of justice. Rule 7.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceeding, 5 O.S. 2011 , Ch. 1, App. 1-A; State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. McArthur, 2013 OK 73, ¶5, __ P.3d __; State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assoc. v. Armstrong, 1990 OK 9, ¶8, 791 P.2d 815.

We agree. The respondent, Mark Anthony Clayborne, is hereby disbarred from the Oklahoma Bar Association and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys.

RESPONDENT DISBARRED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW AND HIS NAME STRICKEN FROM THE ROLL OF ATTORNEYS EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 28, 2013.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT THIS 28th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE

REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON, TAYLOR, COMBS, JJ., concur.

COLBERT, C.J., and GURICH, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n Complainant v. Clayborne

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 28, 2013
2013 OK 92 (Okla. 2013)
Case details for

State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n Complainant v. Clayborne

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION Complainant, v. MARK…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Oct 28, 2013

Citations

2013 OK 92 (Okla. 2013)

Citing Cases

State ex rel., Okla. Bar Ass'n v. Bethea

Rule 8.4, ORPC, 5 O.S.2011, ch. 1, app. 3-A. Thus, evidence of the prior hit-and-run motor vehicle accident…

In re Clayborne

1. Petitioner was convicted of subornation of perjury on April 3, 2011 and received an interim suspension as…