From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Foley v. Vulcan Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 2, 1998
701 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2064.

Submitted September 15, 1998.

Decided December 2, 1998.

Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker and Stephen P. Gast, for relator.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Julie M. Lynch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers' Compensation.


Relator, C.L. Foley, seeks a writ of mandamus ordering respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio to grant his application for permanent total disability compensation ("PTD"). He insists that the commission impermissibly denied him PTD based on the opinions of two doctors who failed to consider all his allowed conditions before they pronounced him able to work. Upon review of the doctors' reports, we agree with the commission that neither doctor ignored the two conditions Foley cites "major depression" and "aggravation of preexisting degenerative arthritis of the low back" that were allowed in 1990. The doctors instead determined that, as of their examinations in 1992, they could not find symptoms of one or the other condition. Their reports constitute some evidence on which the commission could rely in denying PTD. Accordingly, we cannot disturb the commission's decision. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E.2d 936.

The writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

MOYER C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent and would grant the writ.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Foley v. Vulcan Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 2, 1998
701 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State ex rel. Foley v. Vulcan Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. FOLEY v. VULCAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 2, 1998

Citations

701 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 1998)
701 N.E.2d 993

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Tharp v. Consolidated Metal

However, in some circumstances, a medical report must be removed from evidentiary consideration because it…

State ex Rel. Shaffer v. Indus. Comm.

The fact that a condition was allowed in the claim did not require him to find that certain symptoms or…