From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 11, 1931
177 N.E. 766 (Ohio 1931)

Opinion

No. 21876

Decided March 11, 1931.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — Moot question — Workmen's compensation — Rehearing granted.

IN MANDAMUS.

Mr. George B. Smith and Mr. Frank M. Krapp, for relator.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, and Mr. R.R. Zurmehly, for defendant.


During the course of the argument it developed that the Industrial Commission had not made such disposition of the matter as to permit relator to appeal to the common pleas court, and the cause was therefore held in abeyance to permit further proceedings before the Industrial Commission to obviate that difficulty. Since the submission of the cause in this court the Industrial Commission has granted the claimant a rehearing, and the cause has therefore become moot in this court. The relief prayed for must, therefore, be denied on authority of Miner v. Witt, 82 Ohio St. 237.

Writ denied.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.

KINKADE, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 11, 1931
177 N.E. 766 (Ohio 1931)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Comm

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. FISH v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 11, 1931

Citations

177 N.E. 766 (Ohio 1931)
177 N.E. 766

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Karam v. Cull

The facts before the court establish that the legal questions involved have become moot and a writ is…