From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Fant v. Regional Transit Authority

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1990
48 Ohio St. 3d 39 (Ohio 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1232

Submitted November 7, 1989 —

Decided January 10, 1990.

Mandamus — Costs — Civ. R. 54(D) — Court has discretion as to how costs of an action shall be assessed.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 57410.

Henry J. Fant, pro se.


The judgment of the court of appeals of June 1, 1989 dividing the costs of the action between relator and respondent is affirmed. Pursuant to Civ. R. 54(D), the court has discretion as to how the costs of an action shall be assessed.

SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Fant v. Regional Transit Authority

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 10, 1990
48 Ohio St. 3d 39 (Ohio 1990)
Case details for

State ex rel. Fant v. Regional Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. FANT, APPELLANT, v. REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 10, 1990

Citations

48 Ohio St. 3d 39 (Ohio 1990)
548 N.E.2d 240

Citing Cases

Jones v. Olcese

"`Court has discretion as to how costs of an action shall be assessed.' State ex rel. Fant v. Regional…

First Natl. Bank v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

In Jones v. Olcese (1991), 75 Ohio App.3d 34, 42, 598 N.E.2d 853, 858, the court quoted one of the few…