From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Carthan v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 7, 2011
71 So. 3d 299 (La. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010–KH–2199.

2011-10-7

STATE ex rel. Ricky CARTHANv.STATE of Louisiana.


In re Carthan, Ricky;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Beauregard, 36th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. CR196–98; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10–00319.

Denied. Because the statutes in effect at the time he committed the underlying offense authorized a life sentence based on relator's status as a third or fourth offender, his sentence was not rendered illegal as a result of the vacation of one of the predicate convictions upon which his habitual offender adjudication rested. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93–1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 882; State v. Singleton, 09–1269, pp. 1–2, (La.4/23/10), 33 So.3d 889, 889–90 (“To the extent that relator's habitual offender sentence exceeds the maximum penalty the trial court could have imposed for the underlying offense without enhancement of sentence under La.R.S. 15:529.1, relator's application is in the nature of a motion to set aside an

illegal sentence as a matter of La.C.Cr.P. art. 882, which permits correction of a sentence in excess of what the law provides ‘at any time.’ ”).


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Carthan v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 7, 2011
71 So. 3d 299 (La. 2011)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Carthan v. State

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel. Ricky CARTHAN v. STATE of Louisiana

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

71 So. 3d 299 (La. 2011)

Citing Cases

State v. Reed

Under that scenario, if one of the predicate offenses is vacated, the defendant is still correctly sentenced…