From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Buster v. Purdy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 11, 1969
219 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 68-605.

February 11, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Thomas E. Lee, Jr., J.

Jack R. Nageley and Harvey S. Swickle, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Roy S. Wood, Asst. State Atty., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.


The question of insanity in a habeas corpus proceeding is to be determined by the demanding State, not by the asylum State. See: Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U.S. 447, 33 S.Ct. 945, 57 L.Ed. 1274; Brewer v. Turner, 165 Kan. 330, 194 P.2d 507; State ex rel. Davey v. Owen, 133 Ohio St. 96, 12 N.E.2d 144, 114 A.L.R. 686; 31 Am.Jur.2d, Extradition, §§ 15, 51; Anno. 114 A.L.R. 693.

Therefore, the order here under review will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Buster v. Purdy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 11, 1969
219 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Buster v. Purdy

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. JOHN W. BUSTER, APPELLANT, v. E. WILSON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 11, 1969

Citations

219 So. 2d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Superior Court of Imperial Cnty.

For opinions finding such a due process right, see In re Personal Restraint of Jian Liu (2009) 150 Wash.App.…

Pruett v. Barry

Several courts have held or noted that the competence of the accused is irrelevant in extradition…