From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starr v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2230 (W.D. La. Oct. 10, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2230

10-10-2014

SANDRA L. STARR LA. DOC #361498 v. WARDEN JAMES ROGERS


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because Petitioner's claims are barred by the one-year limitation period codified at 28 U.S.C. §2244(d).

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 10th day of October, 2014.

/s/__________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Starr v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2230 (W.D. La. Oct. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Starr v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA L. STARR LA. DOC #361498 v. WARDEN JAMES ROGERS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 10, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2230 (W.D. La. Oct. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Shavers v. Stephens

These cases recognized that "ineffective assistance of counsel at the initial-review collateral attack stage…

Shavers v. Stephens

These cases recognized that "ineffective assistance of counsel at the initial-review collateral attack stage…