From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STARR v. COX

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 5, 2006
05-cv-368-JD (D.N.H. Jun. 5, 2006)

Summary

In Starr, a prisoner asserted a religious right to practice Tai Chi despite not ascribing to Taoism — the system of religious beliefs that often includes the practice of Tai Chi among its religious practices.

Summary of this case from Guzzi v. Thompson

Opinion

05-cv-368-JD.

June 5, 2006


ORDER


After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated May 11, 2006, for the reasons stated therein. Therefore, the motion for preliminary injunction is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

STARR v. COX

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 5, 2006
05-cv-368-JD (D.N.H. Jun. 5, 2006)

In Starr, a prisoner asserted a religious right to practice Tai Chi despite not ascribing to Taoism — the system of religious beliefs that often includes the practice of Tai Chi among its religious practices.

Summary of this case from Guzzi v. Thompson

discussing that the practice of Tai Chi itself is not a religion

Summary of this case from Guzzi v. Thompson
Case details for

STARR v. COX

Case Details

Full title:Darren Starr v. Major Dennis Cox, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jun 5, 2006

Citations

05-cv-368-JD (D.N.H. Jun. 5, 2006)

Citing Cases

Guzzi v. Thompson

The complication in this case is that Guzzi does not allege that he follows Judaism. He describes himself as…

Brown v. Washington

Further, Defendants provided Plaintiff with additional contact information with others who were members of…