From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starlyn B. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Sep 29, 2019
Case No. 6:17-cv-01897-SU (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 6:17-cv-01897-SU

09-29-2019

STARLYN B., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [15] on March 22, 2019, in which she recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's application for benefits. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation [15]. Therefore, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29 day of September, 2019.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Starlyn B. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Sep 29, 2019
Case No. 6:17-cv-01897-SU (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Starlyn B. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:STARLYN B., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 29, 2019

Citations

Case No. 6:17-cv-01897-SU (D. Or. Sep. 29, 2019)

Citing Cases

Margo G. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

” Id. at *5 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Starlyn B. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.,…

Henry v. Saul

These courts have held that the first reason is a proper reason to reject testimony under Bayliss, but the…