From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staples v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 8, 1929
124 So. 122 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

7 Div. 559.

June 25, 1929. Rehearing Granted October 8, 1929.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Clair County; W. J. Martin, Judge.

Frank Staples was convicted of distilling, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded on rehearing.

Frank B. Embry, of Pell City, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, J. Reversed and remanded on rehearing.


On Rehearing.


Upon a reconsideration of this case, and it appearing that the defendant was misled to his prejudice by the unintentional misstatement of the clerk and sheriff of the court with reference to the subpœnaing and serving of defendant's witnesses, and that defendant was, as a result thereof, deprived of the benefit of material testimony in his behalf, and without fault on his part, this court is of the opinion that the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and that the ends of justice require that this judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

The application for rehearing is granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Staples v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 8, 1929
124 So. 122 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Staples v. State

Case Details

Full title:STAPLES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 8, 1929

Citations

124 So. 122 (Ala. Crim. App. 1929)
23 Ala. App. 273

Citing Cases

Traffenstedt v. State

All that was said and done by the parties present while the raid was in progress and the arrests were being…

Bradberry v. State

All that was said or done by the officers while the arrest was being made was part of the res gestae and was…