From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanton v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1900
47 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

January Term, 1900.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


It seems to us that the order appealed from was not necessary to enable the plaintiff to frame his complaint. It may be true that after the issues are joined it may be necessary for the plaintiff, before the trial and in preparation therefor, to have an examination of the defendants at which they could be required to produce their books and to furnish therefrom the information necessary to establish the damages claimed by the plaintiff. But it is by no means necessary that he should be in possession of the entries in the books in order to set out his cause of action. The case of Tayler v. American Ribbon Co. ( 38 App. Div. 144) gives clearly the reasons why such a discovery and inspection are not necessary prior to the service of the complaint. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Rumsey, Patterson and O'Brien, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Stanton v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1900
47 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Stanton v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:Martin J. Stanton, Respondent, v. Solomon Friedman and Edwin Mayer…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1900

Citations

47 App. Div. 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Citing Cases

Boeck v. Smith

As, however, there is no rule of pleading which requires him to state the specific amount which he deems…