From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 12, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-82 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-82 Erie.

April 12, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on April 5, 2006 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on March 21, 2007, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondents. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter [13], filed on March 21, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 12, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-82 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Stanley v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:BILLY C. STANLEY, Petitioner, v. MARILYN BROOKS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 12, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-82 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2007)

Citing Cases

Dunn v. Williams

(citing see, e.g., Tiner v. Poppell, 1993 WL 309877 at * 1 (5th Cir. May 12, 1993) (“an inmate does not have…

Alford v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

There is no federally or Constitutionally guaranteed right to counsel for a parolee in the United States. See…