Summary
affirming dismissal of Stanko's pro se "conditions of confinement" case against Fergus County, Montana jail officials
Summary of this case from Stanko v. PattonOpinion
No. 99-464
October 30, 2000
Dist. 10 (Fergus).
Affirmed
affirming dismissal of Stanko's pro se "conditions of confinement" case against Fergus County, Montana jail officials
Summary of this case from Stanko v. PattonNo. 99-464
October 30, 2000
Dist. 10 (Fergus).
Affirmed
affirming dismissal of Stanko's pro se "conditions of confinement" case against Fergus County, Montana jail officials
Summary of this case from Stanko v. PattonFull title:Stanko v. Rowton
Court:Supreme Court of Montana
Date published: Oct 30, 2000
Those cases include claims against jail officials. See, e.g., Stanko v.Rowton, 303 Mont. 536, 18 P.3d 1031…
Hall v. MyotteIn Montana state court, a suit against a state employee is considered a suit against the State and is subject…