From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standard Water Systems Co. v. Ort

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 15, 1933
166 A. 335 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Argued February 10, 1933 —

Decided May 15, 1933.

Deceased was employed in shaping iron plates, the work requiring somewhat heavy lifting and the use of a sledge hammer. Having completed his morning's work, without unusual incident, he started to walk home for lunch, but feeling unwell, he returned to the plant, and asked to be driven home. While being driven home he slumped in his seat, and died the next day from a heart condition, which the weight of the medical testimony indicated was angina pectoris: Held, that there was a lack of proof that the decedent died as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 659.

For the prosecutor-appellant, McCarter English ( Herbert R. Baer).

For the respondents-appellees, Gebhardt Gebhardt ( W. Reading Gebhardt).


The only question in this case is whether petitioner's decedent met his death by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Our examination of the competent proofs leads us to the conclusion that they do not sustain the action taken by the bureau or the Supreme Court.

The deceased was employed in shaping iron plates, the work requiring somewhat heavy lifting and the use of a sledge hammer. The work for the morning completed, without any unusual occurrence, he left the plant and started to walk home for lunch. Undoubtedly feeling unwell, he returned asking to be driven home. While being driven in the foreman's car he slumped in his seat and died the next day from a heart condition. There is nothing in the record to show that an accident occurred while the decedent was at work. Testimony by his widow that he said he guessed he must have hurt himself while at work is competent proof of nothing. The weight of medical testimony indicates that the petitioner's decedent died of angina pectoris.

The judgment is reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.


Summaries of

Standard Water Systems Co. v. Ort

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 15, 1933
166 A. 335 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Standard Water Systems Co. v. Ort

Case Details

Full title:STANDARD WATER SYSTEMS COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, ALSO CALLED STANDARD WATER…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 15, 1933

Citations

166 A. 335 (N.J. 1933)
166 A. 335

Citing Cases

Bernstein Furniture Co. v. Kelly

Hamilton v. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc., 6 N.J. Mis.R. 399; 145 Atl. Rep. 540; Holzwarth v. Hedden, c., Co., 1 N.J.…

Oldman Boiler Works v. McManigal

There has been no showing of injury or prejudice to the employer because the notice was not given, nor has…