From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stancato v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 11, 1988
526 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-554.

May 17, 1988. Rehearing Denied July 11, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, Richard J. Fowler, J.

Hershoff and Levy and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


The defendant was charged and convicted of manslaughter by operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of Section 316.1931(1), (2)(c), Florida Statutes (1985), and vehicular homicide, in violation of Section 782.071, Florida Statutes (1985). Both charges arose out of a collision in which the driver of the other vehicle was killed.

Originally codified at Section 860.01(1), (2), Florida Statutes (1981), Section 316.1931 was repealed by Chapter 86-296, Section 13, Laws of Florida (effective October 1, 1986), and replaced by Section 316.193, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986). The offense in the present case occurred in April 1986.

We find no error in the trial court's admission of the results of a blood alcohol test administered to the defendant because, contrary to the defendant's contention, (1) the objective facts and circumstances of the defendant's condition and the vehicular accident known to the law enforcement officer who ordered the blood test gave him probable cause to believe that the defendant's operation of her vehicle while intoxicated caused the other driver's death, see § 316.1933(1), Fla. Stat. (1985); Jackson v. State, 456 So.2d 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); and (2) the State laid a proper foundation for the admission of this evidence. However, as the State candidly concedes, there being only one homicide, the defendant cannot be convicted for both the second-degree felony of D.W.I. manslaughter and the third-degree felony of vehicular homicide. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence for the lesser offense of vehicular homicide is vacated. Vela v. State, 450 So.2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), approved, Houser v. State, 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1985); Ubelis v. State, 384 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Thomas v. State, 380 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Carr v. State, 338 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). See generally Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987). We remand for resentencing on the D.W.I. manslaughter conviction after the points scored for the vehicular homicide on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet have been eliminated.

It appears that in Grala v. State, 414 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), this court affirmed convictions for both D.W.I. manslaughter and vehicular homicide as to a single death. On this issue, Grala has been overruled sub silentio by Houser, 474 So.2d 1193.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Stancato v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 11, 1988
526 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Stancato v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY STANCATO, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 11, 1988

Citations

526 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Collins v. State

We think the trial court properly declined to adjudicate Collins on the reckless driving count. In the…