From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stamo v. Wiener

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Oct 31, 1951
328 Mass. 651 (Mass. 1951)

Opinion

October 31, 1951.

F.D. Casey, for the plaintiff.

S.B. Milton, for the defendant.


Exceptions overruled. This is an action at law to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff while being driven home from his place of employment by the defendant, his employer The transportation was one of the terms of his employment. The defendant was insured under the workmen's compensation act (G.L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 152), and the plaintiff did not reserve under § 24, as amended, of the act any rights at common law. Caira v. Caira, 296 Mass. 448, 449. DeStefano v. Alpha Lunch Co. of Boston, 308 Mass. 38, 40. Murphy v. Miettinen, 317 Mass. 633. Adiletto v. Brockton Cut Sole Corp. 322 Mass. 110, 113. Pell v. New Bedford Gas Edison Light Co. 325 Mass. 239, 241.


Summaries of

Stamo v. Wiener

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Oct 31, 1951
328 Mass. 651 (Mass. 1951)
Case details for

Stamo v. Wiener

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE STAMO vs. PHILIP WIENER

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Oct 31, 1951

Citations

328 Mass. 651 (Mass. 1951)
101 N.E.2d 379

Citing Cases

Mikel v. M.B.T.A., No

These facts underscore that the provision of transportation was part of this employee's employment agreement.…