From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Louis, S. F. T. Ry. Co. v. Tudle

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Dec 3, 1914
171 S.W. 797 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

Opinion

No. 1296.

November 18, 1914. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1914.

Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; W. M. Peck, Judge.

Action between James Tudle and others and the St. Louis, San Francisco Texas Railway Company. There was a judgment for the former, and the latter appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Andrews, Ball Streetman, of Ft. Worth, and Head, Smith, Maxey Head, of Sherman, for appellant. J. L. Cobb and Jones Hassell, all of Sherman, for appellees.


The judgment in this case does not dispose of Hallie Tudle, who was a party to the suit. As there is no final judgment, as we conclude, this court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Davis v. Martin, 15 Tex. Civ. App. 62, 53 S.W. 599.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

St. Louis, S. F. T. Ry. Co. v. Tudle

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana
Dec 3, 1914
171 S.W. 797 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)
Case details for

St. Louis, S. F. T. Ry. Co. v. Tudle

Case Details

Full title:ST. LOUIS, S. F. T. RY. CO. v. TUDLE et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana

Date published: Dec 3, 1914

Citations

171 S.W. 797 (Tex. Civ. App. 1914)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Ferrier

The error lies in this: The judgment rendered is not final, in that it does not dispose of all the parties.…