From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ward Brown

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Jun 7, 1913
157 S.W. 1199 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Opinion

May 10, 1913. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1913.

Appeal from Hunt County Court; Geo. B. Hall, Judge.

Action by Ward Brown against the St. Louis San Francisco Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant railway company appeals. Affirmed.

Andrews, Ball Streetman, of Ft. Worth, and Crosby, Hamilton Harrell, of Greenville, for appellant. Clark Leddy, of Greenville, H. C. Coke, of Dallas, and Dashiell, Crumbaugh Coon, of Terrell, for appellees.


This is a suit against the railway company to recover damages for injuries to a shipment of horses from Kansas City, Mo., to Greenville, Tex., wherein a judgment was rendered for plaintiff against the St. Louis San Francisco Railroad Company. The contract of shipment between plaintiffs and said railroad company sued on was in parol, and made by the agent of the railroad company, who was duly authorized to make such a contract. The horses were delivered to said railroad company under said contract, and they were injured in the transportation, to the extent that the jury was justified in awarding the amount of the verdict. We find no error in the charge of the court as complained of, nor in refusing the charges requested. We find nothing in the proceeding contrary to the laws of the United States, nor of this state, that requires a reversal of the case, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.


Summaries of

St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ward Brown

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Jun 7, 1913
157 S.W. 1199 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)
Case details for

St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. Ward Brown

Case Details

Full title:ST. LOUIS S. F. RY. CO. v. WARD BROWN et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas

Date published: Jun 7, 1913

Citations

157 S.W. 1199 (Tex. Civ. App. 1913)

Citing Cases

Spear v. State

The failure to request a ruling on the objection, and that the jury be admonished to disregard this testimony…

Eisele v. Beaudoin

The same may be said as to the speed of an automobile. See, also, Little Rock Traction El. Co. v. Nelson, 66…