From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SS Richmond LLC v. Harrison

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Sep 18, 2023
CIVIL 3:22cv405 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:22cv405 (DJN)

09-18-2023

SS RICHMOND LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER A. HARRISON, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

(ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION)

DAVID J. NOVAK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Objections to the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge (“Objections” (ECF No. 157)), objecting to the R&R (ECF No. 156) entered on August 23, 2023, by the Honorable Mark R. Colombell, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended that Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement (“Motion to Enforce” (ECF No. 133)) be granted and that judgment be entered against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs in the principal amount of Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00) (“Purchase Price”), plus post-judgment interest at the applicable federal rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry until paid. In addition, the R&R recommended that the judgment order reflect that Plaintiffs shall retain ownership of their “Membership Interests,” as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement, until Defendants satisfy the judgment. Upon satisfaction of the judgment, Plaintiffs shall immediately transfer their Membership Interests to Defendants in accordance with Section 2(a) of the Settlement Agreement.

Defendants object to the R&R on the grounds that: (1) final judgment potentially divests the Court of jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement: (2) the issues of prejudgment interest and attorneys' fees are unresolved; and (3) the Court does not have authority to enforce the Settlement Agreement through a motion. (ECF No. 157.) On September 7, 2023, Plaintiffs responded to Defendants' Objections. (ECF No. 161.) Defendants did not reply to Plaintiffs' Response, and the time to do so has expired, rendering this matter ripe for review.

Having reviewed the R&R and the objections thereto, and finding that the objections lack, merit, the Court hereby ORDERS that:

1. Defendants' Objections (ECF No. 157) to the R&R are hereby DENIED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 156) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court;

3. Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce (ECF No. 133) is hereby GRANTED;

4. Judgment be entered against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of the Purchase Price ($6,000,000.00), plus post-judgment interest at the applicable federal rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry until paid;

5. Plaintiffs shall retain ownership of their “Membership Interests,” as that term is defined in the Settlement Agreement, until Defendants satisfy the judgment;

6. Upon satisfaction of the judgment, Plaintiffs shall immediately transfer their Membership Interests to Defendants in accordance with Section 2(a) of the Settlement Agreement; and

7. Plaintiffs shall file pleadings on the issues of Plaintiffs' entitlement to pre-judgment interest and attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs shall have fourteen (14) days from entry of this Order to file, with any responses due no later than fourteen (14) days later and replies six (6) days thereafter.

Let the Clerk file this Order electronically and notify all counsel of record accordingly.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

SS Richmond LLC v. Harrison

United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Sep 18, 2023
CIVIL 3:22cv405 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

SS Richmond LLC v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:SS RICHMOND LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER A. HARRISON, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 3:22cv405 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Sep. 18, 2023)