From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SS Marks LLC v. Morrison Cohen LLP

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2015
133 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

11-10-2015

SS MARKS LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MORRISON COHEN LLP, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC, New York (John Ponterio of counsel), for appellant. Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP, New York (A. Michael Furman and Bain R. Loucks of counsel), for respondents.


Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC, New York (John Ponterio of counsel), for appellant.

Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP, New York (A. Michael Furman and Bain R. Loucks of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered April 18, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint alleging legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to show that defendants were negligent or that their alleged negligence was the proximate cause of the alleged damages (see Kaminsky v. Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 A.D.3d 1, 9, 870 N.Y.S.2d 1 [2008], lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 715, 2009 WL 1810774 [2009] ). It did not, as is required in any legal malpractice case, establish that defendants “failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession [or] meet the exacting standard that but for the attorney's negligence the outcome of the matter would have been substantially different” (id., internal quotation marks and citations omitted] ). In particular, the documentary evidence refutes plaintiff's claim that defendants failed to advise him of the existence and consequence of a subordination provision added to the lease at issue. Further, defendants' failure to obtain a personal guaranty did not cause plaintiff any damages, as the documentary evidence shows that plaintiff assigned its rights to any guaranty to the lenders on the subject transaction.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

SS Marks LLC v. Morrison Cohen LLP

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2015
133 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

SS Marks LLC v. Morrison Cohen LLP

Case Details

Full title:SS MARKS LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MORRISON COHEN LLP, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2015

Citations

133 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
18 N.Y.S.3d 851
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8090

Citing Cases

Millian v. Hafif & Assocs., PLLC

After careful consideration, the Court denies the motion and declines to award summary judgment on the issue…