From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Srigley v. Universal Builders Supply

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1995
217 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 31, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the defendant Delafield Mansion Corporation (hereinafter Delafield) is the alter ego of the Plaintiff's employer, Historic Hudson Valley, Inc., the third-party defendant. Indeed, the plaintiff concedes this fact in his brief. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint and all cross claims against Delafield as barred by the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Shine v. Duncan Petroleum Transp., 60 N.Y.2d 22, 28; Bubnell v. Holmes Ambulance Serv. Corp., 168 A.D.2d 408). Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Srigley v. Universal Builders Supply

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 1995
217 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Srigley v. Universal Builders Supply

Case Details

Full title:ALAN SRIGLEY, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL BUILDERS SUPPLY, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 254