From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Squires v. Squires

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 6, 1925
239 P. 302 (Or. 1925)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs September 22, 1925

Affirmed October 6, 1925

From Yamhill: H.H. BELT, Judge.

For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Vinton Tooze.

For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. Thomas H. Tongue, Jr.

For respondents Frances Dekastacker and Frank Dekastacker there was a brief over the name of Mr. R.L. Connor.


IN BANC.

AFFIRMED.


This is a suit in which both parties prayed for a decree of divorce. There is one child, the issue of the marriage. The testimony was taken in open court and the learned trial judge before whom the testimony was taken denied the granting of relief to either party. A careful examination of the testimony shows that both parties were in fault and that the case comes within the principle that where there is a mutual charge of cruel and inhuman treatment by each of the other, and the testimony shows that both parties are about equally at fault, neither party is entitled to equitable relief. Hence, without further reference to the testimony or the citing of any authorities, the decree of the lower court will be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

AFFIRMED.

All concur, except Mr. Justice BELT, who took no part in the decision.


Summaries of

Squires v. Squires

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 6, 1925
239 P. 302 (Or. 1925)
Case details for

Squires v. Squires

Case Details

Full title:OLIVE A. SQUIRES v. ISAAC J. SQUIRES ET AL

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 6, 1925

Citations

239 P. 302 (Or. 1925)
239 P. 302

Citing Cases

Parks v. Parks

When the conduct of the parties is reprehensible to a kindred degree, the court ought not to interfere at the…

Hollingworth v. Hollingworth

When the conduct of the parties is reprehensible to a kindred degree, the court ought not to interfere at the…