From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 9, 1909
105 P. 673 (Okla. 1909)

Opinion

No. 273

Opinion Filed November 9, 1909.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Record — Statement as to Evidence — Review. Where the case-made upon appeal does not contain a statement that it contains all the evidence presented upon the trial, no error assigned which requires an examination of the evidence can be reviewed by this court.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge.

Action by Gish, Brook Co. against the Springfield Fire Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Motion to reinstate dismissal denied, and writ of error dismissed.

William Thompson and Fulton, Stringer Grant, for plaintiff in error.

A. J. Morris, for defendant in error.


The status of this case is the same as that of Insurance Company of North America v. Gish, Brook Co., ante, p. 78, 105 P. 672. The reasoning and conclusions of the court in that case must follow in this.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 9, 1909
105 P. 673 (Okla. 1909)
Case details for

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.

Case Details

Full title:SPRINGFIELD FIRE MARINE INS. CO. v. GISH, BROOK CO

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 9, 1909

Citations

105 P. 673 (Okla. 1909)
105 P. 673

Citing Cases

Collier et al. v. Gannon

It has time and again been held by this court that, by virtue of said section, the parties were entitled to…