From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spreer v. Savings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Luciano, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the cross motion is denied.

Since the case had not been placed on the court's trial calendar and more discovery was to take place, and given the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff, the court erred in precluding the appellant from adducing expert testimony at trial for failure to respond to the plaintiff's request to disclose information about its expert witness (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]; cf. Corning v Carlin, 178 A.D.2d 576; see also, Aversa v. Taubes, 194 A.D.2d 580 [decided herewith]; Lillis v. D'Souza, 174 A.D.2d 976). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spreer v. Savings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Spreer v. Savings

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS SPREER, Respondent, v. WHITESTONE SAVINGS, F.A., Defendant, and DON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 805

Citing Cases

Martin v. Nyrac, Inc.

However, subsequent to the preclusion order, the court granted the appellant's application to mark the case…

EIFS, Inc. v. Morie Co.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in precluding the plaintiffs' expert…