From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 6, 2002
829 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-222

Opinion filed November 6, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leonard E. Glick, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 96-32448.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Gary K. Milligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.


William Spivey appeals an order resentencing him on count one of Miami-Dade County circuit court case number 96-32448. Defendant-appellant Spivey was originally sentenced to seventeen years as a habitual offender on count one. Pursuant to a motion for postconviction relief, the habitualization was removed from that count and the defendant was sentenced to seventeen years under the sentencing guidelines. He was not represented by counsel at that resentencing.

We have granted the petition for belated appeal of this order.

It appears that the defendant may be entitled to relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). We vacate the sentencing order and remand for a determination whether Heggs is applicable and for resentencing. The defendant shall be present and represented by counsel. Smith v. State, 820 So.2d 1052 (Fla.3d DCA 2002).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Spivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 6, 2002
829 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Spivey v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SPIVEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 6, 2002

Citations

829 So. 2d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Spivey v. State

COPE, J. (concurring). This court's decision in Spivey v. State, 829 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), remanded…

Jordan v. State

The state properly concedes that the resentencing of the defendant without the benefit of counsel was error.…