Spiteri v. Riverside Cnty.

Full title: CARMEL SPITERI, Plaintiff, v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

No. ED CV 11-00822-DSF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. ED CV 11-00822-DSF (VBK)

04-10-2013

CARMEL SPITERI, Plaintiff, v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

DALE S. FISCHER

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING

THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE, AND (2) GRANTING

DEFENDANTS RIVERSIDE COUNTY,

SHERIFF STANLEY SNIFF AND CARREN

ROBINSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT SONOMA

COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court: (1) accepts the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge; (2) grants Defendants City of Riverside, Sheriff Sniff and Carren Robinson's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with prejudice; (3) grants Defendants County of Sonoma, Stephan Passalacqua Tania Partida, Bill Cogbill, A. J. Mittenhalt, Randall Walker and Travis

Ridenhour's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with prejudice; and (4) directs that Judgment be entered dismissing these Defendants from this action.

______________________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE