From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiro v. Einziger

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 29, 1944
182 Misc. 120 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)

Opinion

June 29, 1944.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Richmond, DITORE, J.

Carl D. Isaacs for appellant.

Albert E. Seligman for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Upon the entry of the order of interpleader the action became one in equity ( Clark v. Mosher, 107 N.Y. 118, 122; Levy v. Niklad, 259 A.D. 54) and the court below was therewith divested of all jurisdiction to determine which of the claimants was entitled to be paid the fund in controversy.

The judgment should be reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties.

MacCRATE, SMITH and STEINBRINK, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Spiro v. Einziger

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 29, 1944
182 Misc. 120 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)
Case details for

Spiro v. Einziger

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. SPIRO, Appellant, v. MORTIMER J. EINZIGER, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1944

Citations

182 Misc. 120 (N.Y. App. Term 1944)
50 N.Y.S.2d 85

Citing Cases

Agricultural Insurance Company v. Matthews

For our purposes, Donner's demise extinguished the only interest Matthews ever had, namely, a leasehold…

Agricultural Ins. Co. v. Matthews

For our purposes, Donner's demise extinguished the only interest Matthews ever had, namely, a leasehold…