noting that "pro se litigants in federal court should be granted greater leniency and patience than persons who are represented by counsel"
Summary of this case from Harris v. BNC Mortg., Inc.No. 95-7574.
May 23, 1996.
Appeal from S.D.N.Y.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed in Part, Remanded in Part
noting that "pro se litigants in federal court should be granted greater leniency and patience than persons who are represented by counsel"
Summary of this case from Harris v. BNC Mortg., Inc.Full title:Spiegelman v. Reprise Records
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: May 23, 1996
However, as the Second Circuit has cautioned, "pro se litigants in federal court should be granted greater…
Harris v. BNC Mortg., Inc.As further explained below, the Court dismisses the Complaint based on claim preclusion. Although Plaintiff…