From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spidell v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama
Oct 26, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07cv874-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)

Summary

refusing to aggregate claims when "[t]here is nothing in the notice to indicate why the damages sought in the two counts are not the same and thus should not be aggregated"

Summary of this case from Daniel v. Nationpoint

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07cv874-MHT (WO).

October 26, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


Now before the court is plaintiff's motion to remand this lawsuit back to state court.

Plaintiff brought this lawsuit against defendants charging that they wrongfully sued him to collect a debt that he alleges that he did not owe. Plaintiff lists two causes of action: malicious prosecution (for filing suit against him to collect the debt) and negligence (for improperly filing the suit after he alleges he informed the defendants that he did not owe the debt). Plaintiff seeks $74,000.00 for malicious prosecution and an unspecified amount for negligence. Defendants then removed this lawsuit to this court based on diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441.

A removing defendant has the burden of proving that the $75,000.00 amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction is met, Leonard v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, 279 F.3d 967, 972 (11th Cir. 2002), and, in making the determination of whether this burden has been met, a court is limited to "the notice of removal and accompanying documents." Lowery v. Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1214 (11th Cir. 2007). "A conclusory allegation in the notice of removal that the jurisdictional amount is satisfied, without setting forth the underlying facts supporting such an assertion, is insufficient to meet the defendant's burden." Williams v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 269 F.3d 1316, 1319-20 (11th Cir. 2001). The conclusory allegation in the notice of removal — that, because plaintiff "has specifically prayed for $74,000.00 for his malicious prosecution claim, and has also prayed for an unspecified amount of money for his negligence claim, . . . the amount in controversy in this case clearly exceeds $75,000.00" — is insufficient. There is nothing in the notice to indicate why the damages sought in the two counts are not the same and thus should not be aggregated, with the result that the amount sought is only $74,000.00.

Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the plaintiff's motion to remand (Doc. No. 5) is granted and that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Randolph County, Alabama, for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the remand.

A copy of this checklist is available at the website for the USCA, 11th Circuit at www.cal Luscourts.gov Effective on April 9, 2006, the new fee to file an appeal will increase from $255.00 to $455.00.

CIVIL APPEALS JURISDICTION CHECKLIST

1. Appealable Orders: Appeals from final orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291: 28 U.S.C. § 158Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre 701 F.2d 1 365 1 28 U.S.C. § 636 In cases involving multiple parties or multiple claims, 54Williams v. Bishop 732 F.2d 885 885-86 Budinich v. Becton Dickinson Co. 486 U.S. 196 201 108 S.Ct. 1717 1721-22 LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc. 146 F.3d 832 837 Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a): Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Fed.R.App.P. 5: 28 U.S.C. § 1292 Appeals pursuant to judicially created exceptions to the finality rule: Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. 337 U.S. 541 546 93 L.Ed. 1528Atlantic Fed. Sav. Loan Ass'n v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, Inc. 890 F.2d 371 376 Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. 379 U.S. 148 157 85 S.Ct. 308 312 13 L.Ed.2d 199 2. Time for Filing: Rinaldo v. Corbett 256 F.3d 1276 1278 4 Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1): 3 THE NOTICE MUST BE RECEIVED AND FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT NO LATER THAN THE LAST DAY OF THE APPEAL PERIOD — no additional days are provided for mailing. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(3): Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4): Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) and 4(a)(6): Fed.R.App.P. 4(c): 28 U.S.C. § 1746 3. Format of the notice of appeal: See also 3pro se 4. Effect of a notice of appeal: 4

Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction conferred and strictly limited by statute: (a) Only final orders and judgments of district courts, or final orders of bankruptcy courts which have been appealed to and fully resolved by a district court under , generally are appealable. A final decision is one that "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." , , 368 (11th Ci r. 1 983). A magistrate judge's report and recommendation is not final and appealable until judgment thereon is entered by a district court judge. (c). (b) a judgment as to fewer than all parties or all claims is not a final, appealable decision unless the district court has certified the judgment for immediate review under Fed.R.Civ.P. (b). , , (11th Cir. 1984). A judg ment which resolves all issues except matters, such as attorneys' fees and costs, that are collateral to the merits, is immediately appealable. , , , , , 100 L .Ed.2d 178 (1988); , , (11th Cir. 1998). (c) Appeals are permitted from orders "granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions . . ." and from "[i]nterlocutory decrees . . . determining the rights and liabilities of parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed." Interlocutory appeals from orders denying temporary restraining orders are not permitted. (d) The certification specified in (b) must be obtained before a petition for permission to appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals. The district court's denial of a motion for certification is not itself appealable. (e) Limited exceptions are discussed in cases including, but not limited to: , , , 69S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26, (1949); , , (11th Cir. 1989); , , , , , (1964). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. , , (11th Cir. 2001). In civil cases, Fed.R.App.P. (a) and (c) set the following time limits: (a) A notice of appeal in compliance with the requirements set forth in Fed.R.App.P. must be filed in the district court within 30 days after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from. However, if the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed in the district court within 60 days after such entry. Special filing provisions for inmates are discussed below. (b) "If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party may file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date when the first notice was filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period ends later." (c) If any party makes a timely motion in the district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of a type specified in this rule, the time for appeal for all parties runs from the date of entry of the order disposing of the last such timely filed motion. (d) Under certain limited circumstances, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Under Rule 4(a)(5), the time may be extended if a motion for an extension is filed within 30 days after expiration of the time otherwise provided to file a notice of appeal, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Under Rule 4(a)(6), the time may be extended if the district court finds upon motion that a party did not timely receive notice of the entry of the judgment or order, and that no party would be prejudiced by an extension. (e) If an inmate confined to an institution files a notice of appeal in either a civil case or a criminal case, the notice of appeal is timely if it is deposited in the institution's internal mail system on or before the last day for filing. Timely filing may be shown by a declaration in compliance with or a notarized statement, either of which must set forth the date of deposit and state that first-class postage has been prepaid. Form 1, Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a suitable format. Fed.R.App.P. (c). A notice of appeal must be signed by the appellant. A district court loses jurisdiction (authority) to act after the filing of a timely notice of appeal, except for actions in aid of appellate jurisdiction or to rule on a timely motion of the type specified in Fed.R.App.P. (a)(4).


Summaries of

Spidell v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama
Oct 26, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07cv874-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)

refusing to aggregate claims when "[t]here is nothing in the notice to indicate why the damages sought in the two counts are not the same and thus should not be aggregated"

Summary of this case from Daniel v. Nationpoint
Case details for

Spidell v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS SPIDELL, Plaintiff, v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., and MRC…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama

Date published: Oct 26, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07cv874-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Oct. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

Daniel v. Nationpoint

The defendants have not responded to the argument that aggregation is inappropriate because the plaintiffs…